docs: add project documentation and initial specs

This commit is contained in:
MOH
2026-03-14 13:29:32 +01:00
parent 35734bd2d9
commit 143b441d0c
11 changed files with 819 additions and 0 deletions
+48
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
# Admin Feature Spec
## Current Implementation
### Access model
- Middleware can protect admin routes with Basic Auth
- App login requires configured password and signed cookie session
- Failed password attempts trigger lockout
### Routing
- Source pages live in
`app/_admin`
- Middleware rewrites to
`app/admin-internal`
- Development compatibility routes exist under
`app/root`
### Capabilities
- Overview dashboard
- Maintenance mode
- Media Library
- Site Settings
- Marquee Settings
- SMTP Settings
- Contact Protection
- Portfolio categories
- Portfolio projects
- UI Kit page
## Constraints
- Admin currently assumes a single shared operator credential model
- No role-based access control exists
- No audit log exists
## Recommended Improvements
- Add per-user authentication if multiple operators are expected
- Add action audit logging for content and configuration changes
- Add tests around middleware rewriting and auth edge cases
+59
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
# Contact Feature Spec
## Current Implementation
### Public flow
- Public contact page exists at
`/contact`
- Form fields:
- name
- email
- phone
- company
- message
- Submission uses a server action
- Success redirects to
`/success`
### Protection
- Validation uses
`zod`
- Optional Cloudflare Turnstile verification
- Optional rate limiting by IP window
### Delivery
- Messages are sent by SMTP through
`nodemailer`
- Recipient configuration comes from admin settings
- Messages are not persisted in the database
### Admin controls
- SMTP settings page
- Test email action
- Contact protection settings page
## Risks
- Contact history is lost if email delivery succeeds but later needs auditing
- Rate-limit counters are stored in
`AppConfig`
which mixes operational and business configuration
## Recommended Improvements
- Store contact submissions if the business needs pipeline visibility
- Add spam and abuse observability
- Add structured delivery error reporting
+39
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
# Downloads Feature Spec
## Current Implementation
- Portfolio assets support
`DOCUMENT`
files
- Portfolio detail pages expose document links with an
`Open document`
action
- Media library can store document assets
## Gaps
- No standalone downloads index exists
- No download access rules exist
- No download analytics or gating exists
- No dedicated
`Download`
model exists
## Proposed Scope
This is a proposed feature, not an implemented one.
- Central downloads listing
- Optional download categories
- Optional gated download access
- Download tracking
## Recommended First Step
- Decide whether downloads remain a portfolio asset type or become their own domain
+29
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
# Orders Feature Spec
## Current Implementation
- No
`Order`
model exists
- No checkout flow exists
- No payment integration exists
- No admin order management exists
## Proposed Scope
This is a proposed feature, not an implemented one.
- Order creation from products or inquiry conversions
- Order status lifecycle
- Admin order review and fulfillment tracking
- Email notifications for order events
## Recommended First Step
- Clarify whether
`orders`
means ecommerce checkout, service bookings, or manual sales records
+40
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
# Products Feature Spec
## Current Implementation
- No
`Product`
model exists
- No public
`/products`
route exists
- No admin CRUD exists for products
- The site header contains a disabled
`Products`
navigation item marked as
`Soon`
## Proposed Scope
This is a proposed feature, not an implemented one.
- Public product listing page
- Product detail page
- Product media and downloadable assets
- Admin product CRUD
- Optional relation from products to portfolio case studies
## Recommended First Step
- Define a dedicated
`Product`
data model before any UI work
+32
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
# Project Inquiry Feature Spec
## Current Implementation
- No separate
`ProjectInquiry`
model exists
- No dedicated project inquiry route exists
- Current CTAs route users to the generic contact form
## Proposed Scope
This is a proposed feature, not an implemented one.
- Inquiry form specifically for new project leads
- Optional prefilled source context from portfolio or homepage CTA
- Inquiry status tracking in admin
- Possible conversion into
`Order`
or CRM lead later
## Recommended First Step
- Decide whether project inquiry should stay a specialized
`contact`
variant or become a persisted lead-management feature
+68
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
# Projects Feature Spec
## Scope
This spec documents the currently implemented
`portfolio projects`
domain.
## Current Implementation
### User-facing
- Users can browse published projects on
`/portfolio`
- Users can filter by category
- Users can open a project detail page by slug
- Project detail can render rich sections, galleries, stats, deliverables, and links
- Document assets can be opened from project detail pages
### Admin-facing
- Admin can create, edit, publish, unpublish, and delete projects
- Admin can assign one category per project
- Admin can manage:
- localized titles and summaries
- client name
- project year
- service label
- preview URL
- cover image
- sections
- assets
- featured flag
- published flag
- sort order
- view mode
### Data model
- `PortfolioProject`
- `PortfolioSection`
- `PortfolioAsset`
- `Category`
## Constraints
- Only published projects appear publicly
- Category delete is blocked if projects exist
- Each project must have exactly one category
- View mode is limited to existing enum values
## Recommended Improvements
- Rename this feature from
`portfolio`
to
`projects`
only if the business wants portfolio and project management to be the same domain
- Add preview workflow instead of relying only on publish state
- Add revision history for content changes